This is a particularly interesting piece.It's clearly a Tuck; it bears the 1894 Tuck copyright date, but so far it doesn't seem to be covered in the Tuck "bible", Whitton.
This is a particularly interesting piece.
ReplyDeleteIt's clearly a Tuck; it bears the 1894 Tuck copyright date, but so far it doesn't seem to be covered in the Tuck "bible", Whitton.